Archive for November, 2010

Obama the Destroyer

11/16/2010

That’s right, this useless piece of flotsam should have a tore back old navy destroyer  named in his honor, if he had any. Where am I going with this? Here, feast your eyes on this:

“Big deal…”, you may ask, “…a graph”. Well, this is a very special graph. It’s a graph of the performance of the New York Stock Exchange for last week. The other major markets show similar stats. The thing is, our economy is very much tied to the markets. The fact that it shows dips and peaks is nothing peculiar. What is peculiar is the dates below. Something happened then, and the mainstream media never even connected it to the markets, an  accidental omission, I’m sure. “Okay,” you say, “get to the point, Jack”. Okay, on Friday our illustrious leader opened his pie-hole in India, said something like, “Now the United States  is more like the rest of the world, our economy is closer to the status quo, but we have a ways to go, yet”.

What also happened over the weekend? Oh, not much. It was announced the Fed is just going to print another $800,000,000,000 in funny money for more bailouts. I guess they missed a few groups that supported him during his campaign last printing.

So, there you have it, Obama the Destroyer, the destroyer of markets, economies and nations. In particular, ours. Hey, I didn’t say it, he did. So, you left wing loonies and progressives, who ya’ gonna’ vote for in two years, now? Come on you left wing morons, do I have to draw pictures for you with a big purple crayon and annotate them in single syllable words?

…From the Mouths of babes

11/16/2010

“Just the tip of the iceberg” comes to mind, too. This kid Cody Alicea’s got balls, you know that? He’s 13 and has more balls than the entire Democrat (‘Crat) Party, and most of the Republicans (‘Pubs), too. I say, as soon as he’s 30 appoint him to one of the houses of Congress and make him a leader, there of. You think I’m joking, get off your butt and click the link.

Ya’ back? Good, you see, this is the type of person the ‘Crats, some ‘Pubs and left wing progressive loonies are terrified of. And they should be. You see, they whine, piss and moan about how the Conservatives are bullies. I call…

>>> BULLCRAP! <<<

Like I said, click the damn link and see who the bullies really are. The problem with the left is, they’re the true spineless bullies. Do they back down when a Big Brother or Sister shows up to kick ass on those that give his baby brother or sister grief, or what? You bet they do. Don’t screw with family, you jack asses. And Conservative is all about family.

Shame on you if you only skimmed, because you may have missed the part where Superintendent Edward Parraz said “…the campus recently experienced some racial tension. He said some students got out of hand on Cinco de Mayo”. So the hell what? How is that Aliceas problem? Even if that spineless “superintendent” and I use that term loosely, has to fallow this kid to school every day to protect him, so be it. If he was a real patriot he would have, proudly. Was the ban on Aliceas free speech really about “protecting him” him. Sure, why not?

Also, get a load as to who had to carry this story. That’s right Mostly Snotty Nonsense and Bull Crap. Too bad, they had to because they know their collective butts and credibility is on the skyline, perfect for people like me to pick them off.

You see, that’s what I mean when I say, “Tip of the iceberg”. Yup, as the left found out, yet again, you screw with the tip, the rest is going to come crashing down on your little Gay/Left/Progressive pride parade and screw your whole friggin’ day down the tubes. That’s what I call a man sized can of common sense, you left wing loony morons.

I made This

11/14/2010

Without reading past them, can anyone identify who made the below statements?

 
1. Self reliance weakens The Party and must be discouraged.

2. Placing people in “Classes” discourages cooperation which strengthens The Party.

3. Class warfare strengthens The Party by weakening the wealthy.

4. Encouraging conflict between classes by instilling envy in the lower one strengthens The Party by making the “lower” class dependent on it.

I bet that made some professional Google Users nuts. No, I won’t tell you yet. Instead, let us dissect them. They do sound like something that would spew forth from the pie-hole of “Stalin”, “Marx” or “Lennon”, or, a future “Obama”. But I digress. Let us start with item #1. Self reliance is not only discouraged by dictators, but also left wing loonies and the Democrat Party. It’s obvious how and why in a tyrannical regime, but how with the ‘Crats. Well, we are told that we are hurting the environment, so we must ride city buses. We are told that people who own guns are nuts and we must depend on government for protection. We are told only the government can properly administer health care.

Item #2. The Left wing loonies and unions tell us, with the main stream media, that “Management is out to get us”. They’re mean and want to see us suffer and make a buck in the process. Of course, the Democrat party is right in line with this.

Item #3. By encouraging class warfare between those who are not wealthy and those that are, it potentially weakens the wealthy because there are more votes from the less wealthy. The result is insanely high taxes on the wealthy, who hier the “lower” classes. Talk about “Biting the hand that feeds you”.  As a result, Democrats and their union lapdogs stay in power.

Item #4. The left wing loonies, mainstream media, unions and, of course, ‘Crat Party tells people who are not wealthy that those that are, stole it from them, on the backs on the “little guy”, when in reality, most earned it the hard way. And many times had to go through bankruptcy, one, two, three and sometime even more times before they “Got it right”. Instead of pointing at the wealthy saying “There, see, he/she did it through hard work and self reliance, you can too”, we are told “They’re just lucky crooks that got away with it”.

Now don’t get me wrong. Republicans can be just as devious. But, at least they are for a free market economy, for the most part, where everybody has an equal chance to “Make it big”, or stay working for someone else. It’s their choice and neither should be condemned for that choice. Of course the last time the ‘Pubs were too busy kissing ‘Crat Party ass because they don’t know how to be “In power”. Maybe this time it’ll be different.

Oh, yeah, who penned those statements that sound so eloquently communist? Me. That just goes to show it does not take a mealy mouthed tyrant, politician or college professor to come up with a thought Marx would love. How did I make it sound authentic? Look at how the left wing progressives, unions mainstream media and Democrat party present themselves, “Think inside the box”, like a communist for example, and type out a quick little manifesto. It took all of about five minutes. Now, does that say anything about some college professor in someplace like UC Berkley? It says to me they’re overpaid morons without a clue, or common sense.

Question for Communists in the Free World

11/14/2010

Okay, so it may not be a question, per se. More like a few questions and observations. There is a very small group of people in the Free World in general, and here in the United States in particular, that call themselves “Communists”. I know you (Communists) will spout off that you are a great many. Uh, no, I used a very unscientific, but accurate tool to find out. YouTube. That’s right, YouTube. You see, there are many, many videos posted by the CPUSA (Communist Party United States of America) and other individuals and damn few favorable replies. And the ones that are in favor seem to be in need of serious spell checking and proof reading. Okay, sorry, I could not resist, but it’s true.

Now, when many people post their replies they at some point state the nation they live in or currently reside. Again, YouTube is an invaluable tool to sample demographics on a rapid scale that is actually, accurate. And what did YouTube tell me at this point? None of these replies were from communist nations, they’re from Germany, the US, Britain, France, Canada, etc.

Did I mention they seem to be lacking in control of grammar and spelling? Why yes, but I only alluded to it, so I’ll simply get to the point and say, unequivocally, yes, they do.

Alright now. We have concluded they are few in number, and from generally free nations. My first question is, where are the supporters of communism from communist nations? For example, China, N. Korea and Cuba. Those countries can’t even muster a presence on the Internet sufficient in size to make an apparent majority of people in favor of communism. It would not take much. Any hacker with a rudimentary knowledge of TCP/IP and HTML could do it. Well, any answers?

The next question. Have any of you CBM (Commie Booster Network) members in the Free World ever lived in a communist nation. I’ll wager you have not. How do I know? Easy, there are no replies on YouTube from a communist nation. See, that is how easy it is. Simple, raw, unadulterated logic. Gotta’ love it.

What we have here is a vast minority of people, albeit with very loud squeaky voices, that want to change the political structure of various republics to a communist based system.  The inertia for this kind of change is insurmountable for such a small group of people. After all, they have virtually no help from communist nations. I ask this question, not in sarcasm, but with respect. Why not simply immigrate to a communist nation in the first place? Really, it’s all set up and ready to go. No huge majority of ignorant rubes to deal with while trying to get them to see the light. Think about it, you don’t have to take anything more than a small suitcase because everything is provided for you. You don’t even have to haul so much as a laptop computer with you, because you would not be allowed to have it, at the very least, Internet access. Again, I’m not being sarcastic. These are simply the facts.

This is what I know about communism:
I would have no right to owning anything, not even this laptop.
I would not have a choice of where to live.
I would not have a choice of career.
I would not have a choice of physician when ill.
I would not have a choice of how to invest, or not, my savings.
I would not be allowed to have this web log.
I would get the necessary resources to live, but no more.
I would get surveiled by the government, at every turn.
I would get a government approved re-education.

Lastly, I also know that communism is just the same old washed up ideology as, Aristocracies, Autocracies, Monarchies, Oligarchies and such. Yes, they are all the same as communism. One or a small group of people have control over all others. It comes down to the State owning everything and the individual owning nothing. The idealist communists will disagree. They will say that communism in its pure form is equal distribution of wealth. Oh, fine and dandy. How many times has it been tried? What always happens? You end up with China, N. Korea and Cuba in the end, every time, without fail. The same old worn out tyranny with a different name.

Now, your job is to sell me on communism. Go ahead, give it a try. Unless of course, you’re not really a communist and are actually just trying to be “counter culture”, use communism as “shock value”. Well, whether you’re a phony or the real thing, you’re still a moron.